americanmininglawforum.myfastforum.org Forum Index americanmininglawforum.myfastforum.org
mining, mining law, prospector, mining claim, 1865, 1866, 1872, legal, illegal, government, policy, administrative, mineral, grant, right, forest, service, BLM, DEQ, wild, scenic, hobby, gold, placer, hard, rock, hardrock, dredging, highbanking
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

warm springs placer sawtooth national recreationa area

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    americanmininglawforum.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Welcome
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
1gopher1



Joined: 27 Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Location: Pocatello,Idaho

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:57 am    Post subject: warm springs placer sawtooth national recreationa area  Reply with quote

gopher just tried talking to minerals program leader forest service and was told this being our second summer to try and work our claim and i was told not , am really frustrated by stall tactics and was told they needed an other study on site by myself and forest service land specialists  I am told that this claim from 1960 falls under locatable minerals act 1972.   frustrated an still reading about mining laws. march 3 11:56 2014
_________________
WALLY  NOE , bareclaw2011@yahoo.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoldPatriot



Joined: 30 Dec 2011
Posts: 219
Location: Waldport, Oregon

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unless it's been removed, your claim is valid.. the 1972 act does NOT end or stop your rights.
_________________
" America is at that awkward stage......... It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wallrat



Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 92

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher, I've just been rereading the thread "looking for case law", and trying to understand it better. I'd suggest you read that one. It will point you in the right direction, which I think would be to know the law, and not to file a NOI or POO. At least not until you understand all your options.
 For one thing you are required to work your claim (or pay) in order to keep it "maintenence". That is your choice. But the 1872 law says that you have the right to both occupy and explore for minerals. I will not trade my superior right for an inferior priviledge, by signing a NOI or POO.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    americanmininglawforum.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Welcome All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum